May 1st, 2012 @ // No Comments
(Page 1 of 2 )
Early last week, Google began using a new algorithm to help it combat webspam from black hat SEOs. Dubbed Penguin, it aims to eliminate from the search engine’s listings websites that engage in certain shady practices. But how well does it work?
Google webspam guru Matt Cutts explained the rationale behind Penguin in a post on the Google Webmaster Central blog. He noted that “We see all sorts of webspam techniques every day, from keyword stuffing to link schemes that attempt to propel sites higher in rankings.” Penguin “represents another improvement in our efforts to reduce webspam and promote high quality content.” It’s supposed to decrease the rankings of sites that violate Google’s terms of service.
Cutts gave two examples of websites whose ranks he expected to see drop after Penguin. One displayed egregious keyword stuffing. The crime committed by the other site seemed a little more subtle, until you tried to read its text. It showed a poorly-written piece about exercise, with links about loans randomly scattered throughout the text. The text of the article clearly did not relate at all to the links.
The Penguin algorithm, though going live for all languages at the same time, was expected to have less of an impact than Panda. Cutts noted that Panda’s initial version affected about 12 percent of all queries to some degree; Penguin was supposed to affect only a little over three percent of all English queries. In languages with more heavily-spammed sites, Cutts wrote, Penguin could be expected to affect more queries – five percent of Polish queries, for example.
If you’ve been doing SEO for a few years, you’re probably scratching your head right now. Granted, this is just one of a number of techniques Penguin is penalizing, but really – keyword stuffing? That practice is so old, it predates Google, and no good SEO does it anymore! Is Google only now going after these black hat approaches? As Danny Sullivan observed, “It’s not, even though the blog post might give some newcomers that impression…Rather, what’s really happening is that Google is rolling out better ways that it hopes to detect such abuses.”
One reason Google hopes to do better at fighting this kind of webspam is that, unfortunately, it’s not hard to find websites for which it still works. This discourages white hat SEOs from building the kinds of great websites that Google wants searchers to find. Why go to all the work of building an excellent website (so the thinking goes) when some other site can outrank you just by spending a few hours and a little money on techniques that break Google’s Terms of Service?
In fact, Google seems to have finally gotten the message that SEO is not, in and of itself, a bad thing. If you read Cutts’s blog post, he very clearly describes – and encourages — all the good things that white hat SEOs do for websites. These blessings include making it more crawlable, translating “jargon” into words that normal searchers would use, improving usability, creating great content, improving speed, and so on. It’s not the first time that Google has endorsed white hat SEO, but since it sometimes seems as if the search engine is at war with SEOs in general (as opposed to black hat SEOs in particular), it’s good to see it in black and white.